Institutional Development of Private Military Companies and Defense Service Industry in Türkiye: A Conceptual Analysis on the T-ÖAŞ Model

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17767558

Keywords:

Private Military Companies, T-ÖAŞ, Defense Services Industry, SADAT, ASRİKA, Institutional Autonomy, Capacity Building, Civilizational Security

Abstract

This article examines the evolution of Turkish Private Military Companies (T-ÖAŞ) and the institutional transformation of the defense service industry in Türkiye.
Throughout the historical trajectory from the Ottoman Empire to the Republic, security was institutionalized as a core function of centralized state authority and, during the Republican era, was monopolized within the framework of a rigid military-bureaucratic structure. With the decline of tutelary institutions and the expansion of Türkiye’s foreign policy vision in the 2000s, the security sphere began to incorporate local, national, and civilian-oriented actors. This transformation paved the way for a model of institutional autonomy compatible with state policies, enabling Türkiye to assist friendly and brotherly nations abroad in building their security capacities. Within this framework, the T-ÖAŞ model emerged as a complementary mechanism to Türkiye’s official security institutions—institutionalized through training, consultancy, and strategic planning activities that extend beyond national borders. The theoretical framework developed through the example of SADAT Inc. demonstrates that, as Türkiye freed itself from the constraints of bureaucratic tutelage, it simultaneously advanced toward a nationally grounded and autonomous security paradigm independent of external dependence. This trajectory signifies a profound shift in Turkish strategic thought, where security has transcended its conventional military definition to become a matter of strategic sovereignty and civilizational vision. In contrast to the hegemonic and profit-oriented nature of Foreign-Origin Private Military Companies (Y-ÖAŞ), the T-ÖAŞ model embodies an ethical, normative, and capacity-building approach—offering the Islamic world a legitimate and cooperative alternative grounded in shared civilizational values.

References

Ahmad, F. (2008). Modern Türkiye'nin Oluşumu [The Making of Modern Türkiye]. İstanbul: Kaynak Yayınları.

Avant, D. D. (2005). The Market for Force: The Consequences of Privatizing Security. Cambridge University Press.

Buzan, B. (1991). People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Buzan, B., & Wæver, O. (2009). Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge University Press.

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

Güler, A. (2022). Türkiye’nin Savunma Sanayiinde Kurumsal Dönüşüm ve Güvenlik Politikaları [Institutional Transformation and Security Policies in Türkiye’s Defense Industry]. İstanbul: SETA Yayınları.

Kaya, A. (2023). Medeniyet Temelli Güvenlik Yaklaşımları ve Türk Dış Politikası [Civilization-Based Security Approaches and Turkish Foreign Policy]. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.

Kinsey, C. (2006). Corporate Soldiers and International Security: The Rise of Private Military Companies. Routledge.

Kurtdarcan, B. R. (2013). Uluslararası Hukukta Özel Askerî Şirketler ve Devletin Kuvvet Kullanma Tekeli [Private Military Companies and the Monopoly of Force in International Law] (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Ankara University, Institute of Social Sciences.

Leander, A. (2010). “Commercial Security Practices, Global Security Assemblages and the Government of Insecurity.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 35(4), 493–511.

March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. Free Press.

Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.

Özden, N. (2025). Savunma Hizmet Endüstrisi Bağlamında Türk Özel Askerî Şirketlerin (T-ÖAŞ) Delphi Yöntemi ile Kavramsal Analizi [A Conceptual Analysis of Turkish Private Military Companies (T-PMCs) through the Delphi Method in the Context of the Defense Services Industry] (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). İstanbul Ticaret University, Institute of Social Sciences.

Singer, P. W. (2003). Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry. Cornell University Press.

Peters, B. G. (2019). Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism. Edward Elgar.

SADAT A.Ş. (2017). Kurumsal Tanıtım ve Faaliyet Raporu [Corporate Introduction and Activity Report]. İstanbul: SADAT International Defense Consultancy Inc. Publications.

Walt, S. (1991). “The Renaissance of Security Studies.” International Studies Quarterly, 35(2), 211–239.

Weber, M. (1946). From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Oxford University Press.

Yalçın, M. (2020). Savunma Sanayii ve Güvenlik Ekonomisi: Türkiye Örneği [Defense Industry and Security Economy: The Case of Türkiye]. Ankara: SETA Yayınları.

Yılmaz, M. H. (2018). Askerî Hizmetlerin Özelleşmesi ve Etik Tartışmalar [Privatization of Military Services and Ethical Debates]. İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-04

How to Cite

Özden, N. (2025). Institutional Development of Private Military Companies and Defense Service Industry in Türkiye: A Conceptual Analysis on the T-ÖAŞ Model. Journal of İstanbul School of Technology, 1(2), 233–259. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17767558

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.